Guides
Playwright proxy configuration/guides/playwright-proxyFixing 403 errors when scraping/guides/scraping-403Handling 429 rate limits/guides/scraping-429Python rotating proxies/guides/python-rotating-proxyMCP web scraping setup/guides/mcp-web-scraping
Use cases
Best API for Playwright/use-cases/playwrightWeb access for AI agents/use-cases/ai-agent
Providers
Bright Data/providers/bright-dataZenRows/providers/zenrowsOxylabs/providers/oxylabsApify/providers/apifyDecodo/providers/decodoScraperAPI/providers/scraperapi
Comparisons
Bright Data vs Oxylabs/compare/bright-data-vs-oxylabsZenRows vs ScraperAPI/compare/zenrows-vs-scraperapiBright Data + Playwright vs ZenRows + Playwright/compare/bright-data-vs-zenrows?workload=playwright
Benchmarks
Browser API benchmark · 30D/benchmarks/browser-apiScraping API benchmark · 30D/benchmarks/scraping-api
Demo dataDeterministic sample deployment · no live measurements
● LIVE · LAST BENCHMARK 18 MINUTES AGO (demo clock)

Independent benchmarks for Web Data infrastructure.

Success rate, latency, and cost per successful request. Compare scraping APIs, proxies, browser APIs, and SERP APIs on the same workload, with a transparent methodology.

6
Providers
1,284
Requests / run
6
Regions
90d
History
Scraping API · 7 daysDemo data
Sample tested 14 min ago· n = 1,284· Tokyo
ProviderSuccessp50 latencyCost / 1k ok7d
BBright Data98.4%1.42s$2.85
OOxylabs97.8%1.31s$2.51
ZZenRows96.9%1.80s$1.70
DDecodo96.2%1.56s$1.46
AApify95.7%2.10s$1.25
SScraperAPI94.8%2.35s$1.00
Demo dataLast tested Sep 10, 2026 11:46 UTCn = 1,284 / runTokyo28 runs shown
Trend column: stored runs onlyMethodology →

Live benchmark

Sample tested 14 min ago· n = 1,284· Tokyo· hourly · fixed demo clockMethodology →
Open dashboard
28 stored run(s) oldest demo-scraping-api-083 · started 2026-09-03T11:40:00+00:00 · finished 2026-09-03T11:46:00+00:00 newest demo-scraping-api-136 · started 2026-09-10T11:40:00+00:00 · finished 2026-09-10T11:46:00+00:00100%98%96%94%92%28 stored run(s) oldest demo-scraping-api-083 · started 2026-09-03T11:40:00+00:00 · finished 2026-09-03T11:46:00+00:00 newest demo-scraping-api-136 · started 2026-09-10T11:40:00+00:00 · finished 2026-09-10T11:46:00+00:00100%96%92%
Sep 3Sep 8Sep 9Sep 9Sep 10
Median success rate
96.6%
+0.6 ptsample delta
Median p50 latency
1.68s
−80 mssample delta
Cost / 1k successful
$1.58
−$0.04sample delta

Find the right provider

Sample tested 14 min ago· n = 1,284· Tokyo· hourly · fixed demo clockMethodology →
Optimize for
Browser API
MCP support

Rule-based ranking from sample data. Requirements filter the list; your priority determines the order. No LLM calls.

Top sample match
Success
98.4%
p50 latency
1.42s
Cost / 1k ok
$2.85
  • 98.4% sample success; reliability 92/100.
  • 1.42s p50 and 3.90s p95 sample latency.
  • $2.85 per 1,000 successful requests; 195 sample locations.

Cost calculator preview

Sample tested 14 min ago· n = 1,284· Tokyo· hourly · fixed demo clockMethodology →
Full calculator
100,000

JS off · any region · 50 concurrent · 95% target. Sample plan minimums and retry overhead included.

Recent changes

Changes in the sample 30-day fixture.

About this dataset

Web infrastructure for AI agents

Sample tested 14 min ago· n = 1,284· Tokyo· hourly · fixed demo clockMethodology →
Find a compatible provider
ProviderMCPBrowserSERPExtraction
Bright Data
Oxylabs
ZenRows
Decodo
Apify
ScraperAPI
Bright Data
MCP
Browser
SERP
Extraction
Oxylabs
MCP
Browser
SERP
Extraction
ZenRows
MCP
Browser
SERP
Extraction
Decodo
MCP
Browser
SERP
Extraction
Apify
MCP
Browser
SERP
Extraction
ScraperAPI
MCP
Browser
SERP
Extraction

● supported in the sample dataset · — absent from the sample. Capability flags are not live product verification.

Providers

Sample tested 14 min ago· n = 1,284· Tokyo· hourly · fixed demo clockMethodology →
View all

Technical guides

View all